Triple
T5608594
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Technology Highway |
E147294
|
entity |
| Predicate | appliedToSectionOf |
P47399
|
FINISHED |
| Object | suburban corridor around Boston |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: suburban corridor around Boston | Statement: [Technology Highway, appliedToSectionOf, suburban corridor around Boston]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appliedToSectionOf Context triple: [Technology Highway, appliedToSectionOf, suburban corridor around Boston]
-
A.
hasSectionOn
Indicates that one entity (typically a document or resource) contains a dedicated section or part that specifically addresses or discusses another entity or topic.
-
B.
hasSectionIn
Indicates that one entity contains or includes another entity as a section or subdivision within it.
-
C.
associatedWithSection
chosen
Indicates that one entity is linked or connected to a particular section within a larger structure or context.
-
D.
appliesTo
Indicates that something is relevant, valid, or has effect in relation to a particular entity, case, or context.
-
E.
appliesAt
Indicates that an action, rule, or condition is relevant to or in effect at a specific location, context, or point in time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0090500f881908374285baf0ac46f |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c020fe7ee0819088ced51afd9a4f93 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c01b1b3c98819080687d18ab10a914 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:39 p.m.