Triple

T560301
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sapporo High Court E13434 entity
Predicate hasJapaneseName P9882 FINISHED
Object 札幌高等裁判所 E13434 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 札幌高等裁判所 | Statement: [Sapporo High Court, hasJapaneseName, 札幌高等裁判所]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: 札幌高等裁判所
Context triple: [Sapporo High Court, hasJapaneseName, 札幌高等裁判所]
  • A. Sapporo High Court chosen
    The Sapporo High Court is one of Japan’s regional high courts, serving as an appellate court that reviews decisions from lower courts in its jurisdiction in northern Japan.
  • B. Takamatsu High Court
    The Takamatsu High Court is one of Japan’s regional high courts, serving as an appellate court that reviews decisions from lower courts within its jurisdiction.
  • C. Sendai High Court
    The Sendai High Court is one of Japan’s regional appellate courts, handling appeals from lower courts in the Tōhoku region.
  • D. Osaka High Court
    Osaka High Court is one of Japan’s major regional appellate courts, handling appeals and important cases from lower courts in the Kansai region.
  • E. Nagoya High Court
    Nagoya High Court is one of Japan’s regional high courts, serving as an appellate court that reviews decisions from lower courts within its jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4933edcf08190b35ecfd6014caee6 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a499e13694819087a236bffa6601a9 completed March 1, 2026, 7:56 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a4e9bd6c44819094ba815966ca7937 completed March 2, 2026, 1:37 a.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:32 p.m.