Triple

T5585231
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Big Five studios E146738 entity
Predicate legalEvent P1664 FINISHED
Object United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. E10102 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. | Statement: [Big Five studios, legalEvent, United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
Context triple: [Big Five studios, legalEvent, United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.]
  • A. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
    FCC v. Pacifica Foundation is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the government's authority to regulate indecent material on public airwaves, stemming from a radio broadcast of George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" monologue.
  • B. Paramount Decree of 1948 chosen
    The Paramount Decree of 1948 was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court antitrust ruling that dismantled the major film studios’ vertical control over production, distribution, and theater ownership, reshaping the American movie industry.
  • C. West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish
    West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld minimum wage laws and effectively ended the Lochner era by allowing greater government regulation of economic conditions.
  • D. Eisner v. Macomber
    Eisner v. Macomber is a 1920 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a pro rata stock dividend was not taxable income under the Sixteenth Amendment, shaping early federal income tax doctrine.
  • E. New York Times Co. v. United States
    New York Times Co. v. United States is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers, sharply limiting the government’s power to impose prior restraint on the media.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0090287a08190b4098411effe970c completed March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c02085d0e48190b8d185fe7f3d8579 completed March 22, 2026, 5:01 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c0286558b48190a8907c06111a48f3 completed March 22, 2026, 5:35 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:38 p.m.