Triple
T5570529
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fermat's Last Theorem |
E146188
|
entity |
| Predicate | proofStrategy |
P28214
|
FINISHED |
| Object | proof of a special case of the Taniyama–Shimura–Weil conjecture |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: proof of a special case of the Taniyama–Shimura–Weil conjecture | Statement: [Fermat's Last Theorem, proofStrategy, proof of a special case of the Taniyama–Shimura–Weil conjecture]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proofStrategy Context triple: [Fermat's Last Theorem, proofStrategy, proof of a special case of the Taniyama–Shimura–Weil conjecture]
-
A.
proved
Indicates that one entity has demonstrated the truth or validity of another entity (such as a statement, theorem, or claim) through logical or evidential means.
-
B.
proofRole
Indicates the specific function or responsibility an entity has within the structure or presentation of a proof.
-
C.
usedInProofStyle
chosen
Indicates that one entity is employed as a method, technique, or approach within the proof style or strategy of another entity.
-
D.
typicalProofUses
Indicates that a proof characteristically or commonly employs a particular method, technique, or component.
-
E.
stanceOnProofs
Indicates the position or attitude an entity holds regarding the use, value, or nature of proofs.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008ffed108190a084602227af6157 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c020502a288190af37f9ebb88fccae |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c01b12826c8190969a584d0f53aa44 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:37 p.m.