Triple

T5559816
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article I (Genocide Convention) E145736 entity
Predicate citedIn P771 FINISHED
Object Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007) E76548 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007) | Statement: [Article I (Genocide Convention), citedIn, Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007)
Context triple: [Article I (Genocide Convention), citedIn, Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007)]
  • A. Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007) chosen
    Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007) is a landmark International Court of Justice judgment that addressed state responsibility for genocide during the Bosnian War, including the Srebrenica massacre, and clarified key obligations under the Genocide Convention.
  • B. Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015)
    Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015) is a landmark International Court of Justice case in which the Court adjudicated mutual genocide claims arising from the 1990s Yugoslav wars and clarified key aspects of state responsibility under the Genocide Convention.
  • C. Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY)
    Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY) is a landmark judgment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia that established the Srebrenica massacre as an act of genocide and clarified key legal standards for prosecuting genocide under international law.
  • D. Appeals Chamber of the ICTY
    The Appeals Chamber of the ICTY was the judicial body of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia responsible for hearing and deciding appeals from its trial judgments and sentences.
  • E. Trial Chamber I of the ICTY
    Trial Chamber I of the ICTY was one of the first-instance judicial chambers of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, responsible for conducting trials and issuing judgments in cases involving serious violations of international humanitarian law.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008fcaf788190bafa02a1917ee73b completed March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c020167afc8190b0c518907cd0d99b completed March 22, 2026, 5 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c028424ddc8190869b530a8eb43f50 completed March 22, 2026, 5:34 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:36 p.m.