Triple
T5546791
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | That's the Way It Is |
E145427
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBPMRange |
P22758
|
FINISHED |
| Object | approximately 95–100 BPM |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: approximately 95–100 BPM | Statement: [That's the Way It Is, hasBPMRange, approximately 95–100 BPM]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBPMRange Context triple: [That's the Way It Is, hasBPMRange, approximately 95–100 BPM]
-
A.
hasBPMApprox
chosen
Indicates an approximate beats-per-minute (BPM) value associated with an entity, rather than an exact measured tempo.
-
B.
hasBandRange
Indicates that one entity has an associated range or span of bands (such as frequency or wavelength intervals) defined by the other entity.
-
C.
hasTempoChanges
Indicates that the tempo of the piece or segment changes over its duration, rather than remaining constant.
-
D.
hasTempoMarking
Indicates that a musical passage, piece, or event is associated with a specific tempo indication or marking.
-
E.
hasRhythmicStyle
Indicates that one entity exhibits or is characterized by a particular rhythmic pattern or style in its expression or behavior.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008fb879c81909f5bfa56fadc1d46 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c01fdec3588190b0af7d2ca8e8ee9b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:59 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c01b0e72f08190bf705d8fe1639401 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:35 p.m.