Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Toomer v. Witsell, 334 U.S. 385 (1948) | Statement: [Witsell, caseCitation, Toomer v. Witsell, 334 U.S. 385 (1948)]

Target entity: Toomer v. Witsell, 334 U.S. 385 (1948)
Context triple: [Witsell, caseCitation, Toomer v. Witsell, 334 U.S. 385 (1948)]

• A. Toomer v. Witsell chosen
  Toomer v. Witsell is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly interpreted the Privileges and Immunities Clause by striking down discriminatory state licensing fees imposed on out-of-state commercial fishermen.
• B. Katzenbach v. McClung
  Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
• C. Johnson v. Zerbst
  Johnson v. Zerbst is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held federal courts must provide counsel to indigent defendants in serious criminal cases unless there is a competent and intelligent waiver.
• D. Ingraham v. Wright
  Ingraham v. Wright is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment does not apply to corporal punishment in public schools and that due process does not require a prior hearing before such discipline is imposed.
• E. Briggs v. Elliott
  Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.