Triple
T5543081
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Article 14: Boundaries |
E145338
|
entity |
| Predicate | governsRelationshipWith |
P52773
|
FINISHED |
| Object | neighboring U.S. states |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: neighboring U.S. states | Statement: [Article 14: Boundaries, governsRelationshipWith, neighboring U.S. states]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: governsRelationshipWith Context triple: [Article 14: Boundaries, governsRelationshipWith, neighboring U.S. states]
-
A.
governingPowerRelationship
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one entity holds authoritative control, influence, or ruling power over another entity.
-
B.
definesRelationshipBetween
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the nature, type, or rules of a relationship that exists between two or more other entities.
-
C.
inRelationshipWith
Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
-
D.
governs
Indicates that one entity exercises authoritative control, direction, or rule over another entity or domain.
-
E.
governedWith
Indicates that two or more entities share or participate together in the act or process of governing.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008fa64888190adae56c8f9ea4031 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c01fc947bc81908d1f7b709392ec20 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c01b0e72f08190bf705d8fe1639401 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:35 p.m.