Triple
T5542699
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Richmond (Yorks) |
E145327
|
entity |
| Predicate | votingTrend |
P41291
|
FINISHED |
| Object | one of the safest Conservative seats in the UK |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: one of the safest Conservative seats in the UK | Statement: [Richmond (Yorks), votingTrend, one of the safest Conservative seats in the UK]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: votingTrend Context triple: [Richmond (Yorks), votingTrend, one of the safest Conservative seats in the UK]
-
A.
currentPoliticalTrend
chosen
Indicates the prevailing direction or pattern of political attitudes, behaviors, or power dynamics at a given time.
-
B.
popularVotes
Indicates the number of votes an entity (such as a candidate or option) receives directly from individual voters in an election or decision process.
-
C.
popularVoteType
Indicates the specific method or category by which a popular vote is conducted or classified in an election or decision process.
-
D.
voterTurnoutChange
Indicates the amount or direction of change in voter turnout between two elections or time periods.
-
E.
popularVote
Indicates the number or share of votes directly cast by the general electorate for a candidate or option in an election.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008fa64888190adae56c8f9ea4031 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c01fc7e26481908cec8d0483170ea5 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c01b0e72f08190bf705d8fe1639401 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:35 p.m.