Triple

T5542150
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Central Wisconsin E145314 entity
Predicate contains P35 FINISHED
Object Juneau County E265793 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Juneau County | Statement: [Central Wisconsin, contains, Juneau County]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Juneau County
Context triple: [Central Wisconsin, contains, Juneau County]
  • A. Juneau County, Wisconsin chosen
    Juneau County, Wisconsin is a largely rural county in central Wisconsin known for its forests, lakes, and small communities such as Mauston and New Lisbon.
  • B. Alcona County
    Alcona County is a rural county in northeastern Lower Michigan known for its forests, inland lakes, and Lake Huron shoreline.
  • C. Clearwater County
    Clearwater County is a rural county in north-central Idaho known for its forested mountains, rivers, and outdoor recreation opportunities.
  • D. Ogemaw County
    Ogemaw County is a rural county in the northeastern Lower Peninsula of Michigan, known for its forests, lakes, and outdoor recreation opportunities.
  • E. Forest County
    Forest County is a sparsely populated, heavily forested rural county in northwestern Pennsylvania known for its extensive public lands and outdoor recreation.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008fa64888190adae56c8f9ea4031 completed March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c01fc7e26481908cec8d0483170ea5 completed March 22, 2026, 4:58 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c07d6edb7481908e94de7314ca70cc completed March 22, 2026, 11:38 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:35 p.m.