Triple
T5535045
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Matlatzinca culture |
E145138
|
entity |
| Predicate | heritageLanguageStatus |
P35871
|
FINISHED |
| Object | endangered |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: endangered | Statement: [Matlatzinca culture, heritageLanguageStatus, endangered]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: heritageLanguageStatus Context triple: [Matlatzinca culture, heritageLanguageStatus, endangered]
-
A.
heritageLanguage
Indicates that one entity is the ancestral or culturally inherited language associated with another entity.
-
B.
ethnicLanguageStatus
chosen
Indicates the status or role of a language in relation to a particular ethnic group (e.g., primary, secondary, heritage, or minority language).
-
C.
historicalLanguageStatus
Indicates that a language had a particular official, social, or functional status during a past historical period.
-
D.
nationalLanguageStatus
Indicates that a language holds official or nationally recognized status within a country or political entity.
-
E.
languageEndangermentStatus
Indicates the degree to which a language is at risk of falling out of use or becoming extinct.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008f9955881909bfa8348b56b4739 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c01faed1d08190b6a57faedaf1b56a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c01b0c50e48190a1b03ecd20ca440b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:34 p.m.