Triple
T5534971
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Puebla Valley |
E145137
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cholula |
E50501
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cholula | Statement: [Puebla Valley, contains, Cholula]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cholula Context triple: [Puebla Valley, contains, Cholula]
-
A.
Cholula
chosen
Cholula is a historic Mexican city famed for its Great Pyramid and rich pre-Hispanic and colonial heritage.
-
B.
Topolobampo
Topolobampo is a major Pacific coast port city in northwestern Mexico, serving as an important hub for maritime trade and ferry connections in the state of Sinaloa.
-
C.
San Andrés Cholula
San Andrés Cholula is a historic municipality in the Mexican state of Puebla, known for its colonial architecture, vibrant cultural traditions, and proximity to the Great Pyramid of Cholula.
-
D.
San Pedro Cholula
San Pedro Cholula is a historic Mexican city in the state of Puebla, renowned for its colonial architecture and proximity to the Great Pyramid of Cholula.
-
E.
Tejipió
Tejipió is a neighborhood in the city of Recife, Brazil, known as part of the urban fabric of the state capital of Pernambuco.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008f9955881909bfa8348b56b4739 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c01faed1d08190b6a57faedaf1b56a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c02810084c81909fde56d6ee4ad328 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:34 p.m.