Triple
T5499130
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | W− boson |
E144282
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHelicityStates |
P3977
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ±1 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ±1 | Statement: [W− boson, hasHelicityStates, ±1]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHelicityStates Context triple: [W− boson, hasHelicityStates, ±1]
-
A.
hasHelicity
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific helicity, i.e., a handedness or twist-related property in its structure or motion.
-
B.
hasIsospin
Indicates that one particle possesses a specific isospin value or quantum number in relation to another reference or classification framework.
-
C.
hasWeakIsospin
Indicates that an entity possesses a specified value of weak isospin, representing its charge under the weak nuclear interaction.
-
D.
isChiralInStandardModel
Indicates that the entity’s behavior or interaction in the Standard Model depends on its handedness (left- or right-handed), i.e., it is not invariant under parity transformation.
-
E.
hasIsospinThirdComponent
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific value of the third (z) component of its isospin in isospin space.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008f5a2748190bce7a39aabf87a6d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c01f08c2a4819093e772a1497c7ecc |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c01b052f3c81909f71c6add0f35a6f |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:32 p.m.