Triple
T5484795
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Battle Mountain mining district |
E123552
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMiningCommodity |
P64308
|
FINISHED |
| Object | precious metals |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: precious metals | Statement: [Battle Mountain mining district, hasMiningCommodity, precious metals]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMiningCommodity Context triple: [Battle Mountain mining district, hasMiningCommodity, precious metals]
-
A.
hasMiningActivity
Indicates that some form of mining operation or extraction activity is occurring at, involving, or associated with the referenced entity.
-
B.
hasMiningArea
Indicates that an entity possesses, controls, or is associated with a designated area where mining activities take place.
-
C.
hasMineral
Indicates that one entity contains, includes, or is composed of a specified mineral.
-
D.
hasMiningDistrict
Indicates that an entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a designated mining district within its domain or jurisdiction.
-
E.
hasNotableMine
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a mine considered significant or noteworthy in some context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4648883481909e9775d43300c5fa |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd93e5d0f08190a6cc9fc408b7c5bb |
completed | March 20, 2026, 6:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd91a73b148190a865243536a4fe76 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 6:27 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd93e4d2d081908eb75ee22fe72824 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 6:37 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:10 p.m.