Triple
T5474189
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kielce County |
E122908
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRuralGmina |
P46876
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Masłów |
E521990
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Masłów | Statement: [Kielce County, hasRuralGmina, Gmina Masłów]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Masłów Context triple: [Kielce County, hasRuralGmina, Gmina Masłów]
-
A.
Gmina Masłów
chosen
Gmina Masłów is a rural administrative district in south-central Poland, located near the city of Kielce in the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship.
-
B.
Gmina Morawica
Gmina Morawica is an administrative district in south-central Poland, located in the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship and encompassing the town of Morawica and surrounding villages.
-
C.
Gmina Bolesław
Gmina Bolesław is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
-
D.
Gmina Muszyna
Gmina Muszyna is a rural-urban administrative district in southern Poland, centered on the spa town of Muszyna near the Slovak border.
-
E.
Gmina Bielawy
Gmina Bielawy is a rural administrative district in central Poland, known for encompassing several villages and agricultural areas.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd46459ff48190823377457bcf7128 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd9232ded08190b4142e604319b2ba |
completed | March 20, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bf6c7a61848190970a4e34696791eb |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:13 a.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:09 p.m.