Triple
T5474176
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kielce County |
E122908
|
entity |
| Predicate | bordersWith |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | city of Kielce |
E119671
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: city of Kielce | Statement: [Kielce County, bordersWith, city of Kielce]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: city of Kielce Context triple: [Kielce County, bordersWith, city of Kielce]
-
A.
Kielce
Kielce is a city in south-central Poland known as an important regional center for industry, education, and culture.
-
B.
Kielce (city with county rights)
chosen
Kielce is a historic city in south-central Poland that serves as the capital and main economic, cultural, and educational center of the Świętokrzyskie region.
-
C.
Kalisz
Kalisz is one of Poland’s oldest cities, located in the Greater Poland region and known for its historical architecture and cultural heritage.
-
D.
Opole Silesia
Opole Silesia is a historical and cultural region in southwestern Poland, known for its mixed Polish-German heritage and centered around the city of Opole.
-
E.
Zamość
Zamość is a Renaissance-planned city in southeastern Poland, renowned for its well-preserved Old Town and UNESCO World Heritage status.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd46459ff48190823377457bcf7128 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd9232ded08190b4142e604319b2ba |
completed | March 20, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bf48982b348190907c11424559cf76 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:09 p.m.