Triple
T5474174
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kielce County |
E122908
|
entity |
| Predicate | bordersWith |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Końskie County |
E133980
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Końskie County | Statement: [Kielce County, bordersWith, Końskie County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Końskie County Context triple: [Kielce County, bordersWith, Końskie County]
-
A.
Końskie County
chosen
Końskie County is an administrative district in south-central Poland, known for its mix of small towns, rural landscapes, and historical sites.
-
B.
Kazimierza County
Kazimierza County is an administrative district in south-central Poland known for its rural character and location within the historic Świętokrzyskie region.
-
C.
Opatów County
Opatów County is an administrative district in south-central Poland known for its historic town of Opatów and its location within the Świętokrzyskie region.
-
D.
Pajęczno County
Pajęczno County is an administrative district in central Poland known for its rural character and location within the Łódź region.
-
E.
Łowicz County
Łowicz County is an administrative district in central Poland’s Łódź Voivodeship, known for its historic towns, traditional folk culture, and agricultural landscape.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd46459ff48190823377457bcf7128 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd9232ded08190b4142e604319b2ba |
completed | March 20, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bf91f16c9c819088e7671ccf006189 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:53 a.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:09 p.m.