Triple
T5454883
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Abe Reles became a government informant |
E122454
|
entity |
| Predicate | involvedLegalProcess |
P7077
|
FINISHED |
| Object | grand jury testimony |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: grand jury testimony | Statement: [Abe Reles became a government informant, involvedLegalProcess, grand jury testimony]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: involvedLegalProcess Context triple: [Abe Reles became a government informant, involvedLegalProcess, grand jury testimony]
-
A.
relatedLegalProcess
Indicates that there is an associated legal proceeding or action that is connected to, arises from, or is otherwise relevant to the referenced entity or event.
-
B.
hasLegalProceeding
Indicates that there is a formal legal action, case, or proceeding involving the related entities.
-
C.
legalDocumentInvolvement
Indicates that an entity is involved with a legal document in some specified role (e.g., author, signer, subject, or recipient).
-
D.
legalProcedureUsed
chosen
Indicates that a particular legal procedure or process is applied or employed in relation to a case, action, or legal matter.
-
E.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd46424248819085282ddf50a565f3 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd927c946c8190aef40679199fede3 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd91a0d96c8190bd1299edbf764bbb |
completed | March 20, 2026, 6:27 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:08 p.m.