Triple
T5405790
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Benjamin N. Cardozo |
E120888
|
entity |
| Predicate | influenced |
P9
|
FINISHED |
| Object | American legal realism |
E103579
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: American legal realism | Statement: [Benjamin N. Cardozo, influenced, American legal realism]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: American legal realism Context triple: [Benjamin N. Cardozo, influenced, American legal realism]
-
A.
legal realism
chosen
Legal realism is a jurisprudential movement that emphasizes how judges actually decide cases in practice—shaped by social, political, and psychological factors—rather than strictly following abstract legal rules.
-
B.
law and economics movement
The law and economics movement is an intellectual approach to legal theory that applies economic principles and methods—especially those associated with the Chicago School—to analyze and shape laws, legal institutions, and judicial decisions.
-
C.
The Growth of the Law
The Growth of the Law is a seminal legal treatise by Benjamin N. Cardozo that explores how judicial decision-making and evolving social needs shape the development of common law.
-
D.
Interpretations of Legal History
Interpretations of Legal History is a scholarly work by Roscoe Pound that examines the development and underlying philosophies of legal systems over time.
-
E.
The Paradoxes of Legal Science
The Paradoxes of Legal Science is a 1928 jurisprudential treatise by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo that explores the philosophical tensions and logical contradictions within legal reasoning and doctrine.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd46391c0c81909fa484446732b6a3 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd87924c588190beb4a1be27f8d11b |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:44 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bf3394af9c81909f9a3bb06d48595d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 12:11 a.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:05 p.m.