Triple

T538732
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Deus sive Natura E12381 entity
Predicate relationToProvidence P16618 FINISHED
Object denies anthropomorphic divine providence LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: denies anthropomorphic divine providence | Statement: [Deus sive Natura, relationToProvidence, denies anthropomorphic divine providence]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationToProvidence
Context triple: [Deus sive Natura, relationToProvidence, denies anthropomorphic divine providence]
  • A. hasFamilialTieTo
    Indicates a relationship where two entities are connected by family bonds, such as by blood, marriage, or adoption.
  • B. closestLivingRelatives
    Indicates that the related entities are the most closely related to each other among all currently living entities, in terms of evolutionary or genealogical proximity.
  • C. relationshipToHumans
    Indicates the nature or type of connection, association, or relevance that something has specifically with humans.
  • D. relationshipType
    Indicates the specific kind of relationship that exists between two or more entities.
  • E. moreDistantlyRelatedTo
    Indicates that one entity is related to another by a more distant or indirect relationship compared to some closer reference relationship.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4933208e88190891f5debab1b776d completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4985e51908190a34aa82ea9dbee1e completed March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a494b67c308190a1a225ab7c4b74c6 completed March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a49857e1148190aa782b82675cf0b5 completed March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:32 p.m.