Triple
T53787
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | atomic bombing of Hiroshima |
E1059
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusDebate |
P1783
|
FINISHED |
| Object | subject of international law and ethics debates |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: subject of international law and ethics debates | Statement: [atomic bombing of Hiroshima, legalStatusDebate, subject of international law and ethics debates]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusDebate Context triple: [atomic bombing of Hiroshima, legalStatusDebate, subject of international law and ethics debates]
-
A.
hasLegalStatus
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular legal classification, recognition, or standing under law.
-
B.
legalStatusOfElectors
Indicates the legal standing, rights, and recognition granted to electors under applicable laws or regulations.
-
C.
controversy
chosen
Indicates a situation in which there is active disagreement, dispute, or public debate between parties over a particular issue, action, or claim.
-
D.
ethicalDebate
Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, questioning, or disputing the moral rightness or wrongness of actions, policies, or principles.
-
E.
politicalRationale
Indicates the reasoning, justification, or strategic considerations underlying a political decision, stance, or action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a248adc5b48190aa8db9fb092fb28a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:45 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24b3a9e848190b80de3c858678b3a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ac52fb08190aa7c38f83434f795 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:50 a.m.