Triple
T5374814
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Adrianople |
E108934
|
entity |
| Predicate | siteOfSiege |
P11070
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Siege of Adrianople (813)
The Siege of Adrianople (813) was a major early 9th-century military engagement in which Bulgarian forces under Khan Krum besieged and captured the Byzantine city of Adrianople during the Byzantine–Bulgarian wars.
|
E516320
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Siege of Adrianople (813) | Statement: [Adrianople, siteOfSiege, Siege of Adrianople (813)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Siege of Adrianople (813) Context triple: [Adrianople, siteOfSiege, Siege of Adrianople (813)]
-
A.
Siege of Dyrrhachium (1081)
The Siege of Dyrrhachium (1081) was a major military engagement in which Norman forces under Robert Guiscard besieged and captured the key Byzantine port city of Dyrrhachium on the Adriatic coast, marking a critical episode in the Norman–Byzantine wars.
-
B.
Siege of Larissa (1083)
The Siege of Larissa (1083) was a key military engagement during the Norman invasion of the Byzantine Empire, in which Byzantine forces under Alexios I Komnenos successfully defended the city of Larissa in Thessaly against Norman attackers.
-
C.
Siege of Constantinople (626)
The Siege of Constantinople in 626 was a major failed joint Avar and Sasanian attempt to capture the Byzantine capital, marking a decisive turning point in the Roman–Persian Wars.
-
D.
Siege of Antioch (540)
The Siege of Antioch (540) was a major Sasanian Persian capture and sack of the prominent Byzantine city of Antioch under King Khosrow I, marking a pivotal moment in the Roman–Persian conflicts of Late Antiquity.
-
E.
Siege of Nicaea
The Siege of Nicaea was a pivotal 1097 military campaign in the First Crusade in which Crusader and Byzantine forces captured the Seljuk-held city of Nicaea, opening the way into Anatolia.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Siege of Adrianople (813) Triple: [Adrianople, siteOfSiege, Siege of Adrianople (813)]
Generated description
The Siege of Adrianople (813) was a major early 9th-century military engagement in which Bulgarian forces under Khan Krum besieged and captured the Byzantine city of Adrianople during the Byzantine–Bulgarian wars.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Siege of Adrianople (813) Target entity description: The Siege of Adrianople (813) was a major early 9th-century military engagement in which Bulgarian forces under Khan Krum besieged and captured the Byzantine city of Adrianople during the Byzantine–Bulgarian wars.
-
A.
Siege of Dyrrhachium (1081)
The Siege of Dyrrhachium (1081) was a major military engagement in which Norman forces under Robert Guiscard besieged and captured the key Byzantine port city of Dyrrhachium on the Adriatic coast, marking a critical episode in the Norman–Byzantine wars.
-
B.
Siege of Larissa (1083)
The Siege of Larissa (1083) was a key military engagement during the Norman invasion of the Byzantine Empire, in which Byzantine forces under Alexios I Komnenos successfully defended the city of Larissa in Thessaly against Norman attackers.
-
C.
Siege of Constantinople (626)
The Siege of Constantinople in 626 was a major failed joint Avar and Sasanian attempt to capture the Byzantine capital, marking a decisive turning point in the Roman–Persian Wars.
-
D.
Siege of Antioch (540)
The Siege of Antioch (540) was a major Sasanian Persian capture and sack of the prominent Byzantine city of Antioch under King Khosrow I, marking a pivotal moment in the Roman–Persian conflicts of Late Antiquity.
-
E.
Siege of Nicaea
The Siege of Nicaea was a pivotal 1097 military campaign in the First Crusade in which Crusader and Byzantine forces captured the Seljuk-held city of Nicaea, opening the way into Anatolia.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: siteOfSiege Context triple: [Adrianople, siteOfSiege, Siege of Adrianople (813)]
-
A.
isSiegeOf
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one event or action constitutes the military siege of a particular place, target, or entity.
-
B.
besiegedIn
Indicates that one entity is under siege at, or during the event of, another specified location or time.
-
C.
hasMajorSiege
Indicates that a significant or large-scale siege event occurred involving the related entities.
-
D.
battleOccurredNear
Indicates that a battle took place in spatial proximity to a specified location or entity.
-
E.
capturedPlace
Indicates that an agent took control of or seized a specific place, typically through force or strategic action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd440c77948190aad2a5f39b7b80f5 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd88801b188190b9ac35ed89167fa3 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bf293f6458819091c32080782b56ed |
completed | March 21, 2026, 11:26 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69bf2a23ba1881909ddc549728bbc2d3 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 11:30 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69bf2e6d5f9081908327dff0058241f0 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 11:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd846172788190969f24bc7503c05e |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:03 p.m.