Triple
T5348329
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | C Jam Blues |
E124109
|
entity |
| Predicate | rhythmicFeel |
P7864
|
FINISHED |
| Object | swing |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: swing | Statement: [C Jam Blues, rhythmicFeel, swing]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rhythmicFeel Context triple: [C Jam Blues, rhythmicFeel, swing]
-
A.
hasRhythmicStyle
chosen
Indicates that one entity exhibits or is characterized by a particular rhythmic pattern or style in its expression or behavior.
-
B.
typicalTempoControl
Indicates that one entity serves as the usual or standard means by which the tempo of another entity (such as a process or activity) is regulated or controlled.
-
C.
musicDriven
Indicates that one entity’s behavior, structure, or progression is guided, influenced, or determined primarily by music or musical elements.
-
D.
musicMovement
Indicates a relationship where a musical work, performance, or composition is associated with a specific movement or section within a larger musical piece.
-
E.
hasBPMApprox
Indicates an approximate beats-per-minute (BPM) value associated with an entity, rather than an exact measured tempo.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd464be27081908807b40b75c1bbae |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd85ef75148190815461c2a49302e9 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd845c6f108190832a8d14b356368a |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:01 p.m.