Triple
T5347067
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RADIUS |
E124082
|
entity |
| Predicate | canProxyTo |
P3670
|
FINISHED |
| Object | other RADIUS servers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: other RADIUS servers | Statement: [RADIUS, canProxyTo, other RADIUS servers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canProxyTo Context triple: [RADIUS, canProxyTo, other RADIUS servers]
-
A.
canDelegateTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the authority or ability to transfer or assign its responsibilities, tasks, or decision-making power to another entity.
-
B.
canRefer
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to mention, point to, or direct attention to another entity.
-
C.
canAuthorize
Indicates that one entity has the power or permission to grant approval or official permission for another entity to perform an action or access a resource.
-
D.
canPass
Indicates that one entity is able or permitted to move through, cross, or successfully traverse another entity or barrier.
-
E.
canOwn
Indicates that one entity is permitted or legally able to possess or hold ownership rights over another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd464be27081908807b40b75c1bbae |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd85ede7c481908347d557aa4d19ad |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd845a62b081909782863865b257a9 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:01 p.m.