Triple
T53323
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Operational Camouflage Pattern |
E1049
|
entity |
| Predicate | developmentBasis |
P1245
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Scorpion camouflage pattern |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Scorpion camouflage pattern | Statement: [Operational Camouflage Pattern, developmentBasis, Scorpion camouflage pattern]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developmentBasis Context triple: [Operational Camouflage Pattern, developmentBasis, Scorpion camouflage pattern]
-
A.
developed
Indicates that one entity created, designed, or brought another entity into a more advanced or complete state through effort or work.
-
B.
hasDevelopmentType
Indicates the type or category of development associated with an entity, such as the nature, form, or stage of its development.
-
C.
developedAlong
Indicates that something was created, constructed, or evolved following the course, path, or boundary of something else.
-
D.
developedFrom
chosen
Indicates that one entity originates, evolves, or is derived from another as its source or precursor.
-
E.
developedAt
Indicates the place or location where something was created, built, or developed.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a248adc5b48190aa8db9fb092fb28a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:45 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24c709c248190bcd442c8d508e48c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ac3c8dc819099849023bdaa35a9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:50 a.m.