Triple
T5326616
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Batak script |
E123201
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasVariant |
P455
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Karo Batak script |
E123201
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Karo Batak script | Statement: [Batak script, hasVariant, Karo Batak script]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Karo Batak script Context triple: [Batak script, hasVariant, Karo Batak script]
-
A.
Batak script
chosen
Batak script is an indigenous writing system from northern Sumatra historically used to write the various Batak languages.
-
B.
Rejang script
Rejang script is an indigenous Brahmic-derived writing system used primarily for the Rejang language of southwestern Sumatra, Indonesia.
-
C.
Sundanese script
The Sundanese script is an abugida used historically and in modern times to write the Sundanese language of West Java, Indonesia.
-
D.
Lontara script
The Lontara script is an indigenous writing system traditionally used by the Bugis and Makassarese peoples of South Sulawesi, Indonesia, to write their Austronesian languages.
-
E.
Tagbanwa script
Tagbanwa script is an indigenous Brahmic-derived writing system historically used by the Tagbanwa people of Palawan in the Philippines to write their native languages.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd46477f9081909d242a327d749466 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd85912d24819093cc405bebe8e870 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bf21bba3f8819085efcb9d75fea1f9 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 10:54 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2 p.m.