Triple
T532433
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Doctrine of Lapse |
E12251
|
entity |
| Predicate | justifiedAs |
P11285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | doctrine of escheat |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: doctrine of escheat | Statement: [Doctrine of Lapse, justifiedAs, doctrine of escheat]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: justifiedAs Context triple: [Doctrine of Lapse, justifiedAs, doctrine of escheat]
-
A.
justified
Indicates that an action, belief, or decision is supported by sufficient reasons or evidence to be considered reasonable or warranted.
-
B.
justification
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides a reason, explanation, or supporting argument for the existence, validity, or appropriateness of another entity or claim.
-
C.
justiceInMajority
Indicates that the concept or outcome of justice is reflected in, supported by, or aligned with the position held by the majority.
-
D.
concurringJustice
Indicates that a justice agrees with the court’s judgment or outcome but writes or joins a separate concurring opinion expressing different or additional reasoning.
-
E.
positionedAgainst
Indicates that one entity is placed so that it directly faces or is set opposite to another entity, often in close or contacting alignment.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4933208e88190891f5debab1b776d |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4985e51908190a34aa82ea9dbee1e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a494b3e49081909810fa417b31306f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:32 p.m.