Triple

T531692
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gunpowder Empires E12235 entity
Predicate hasMilitaryFeature P7256 FINISHED
Object standing army LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: standing army | Statement: [Gunpowder Empires, hasMilitaryFeature, standing army]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMilitaryFeature
Context triple: [Gunpowder Empires, hasMilitaryFeature, standing army]
  • A. militaryCharacteristic chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses a specific military-related attribute, quality, or feature in relation to another entity or context.
  • B. hasMilitaryPresence
    Indicates that a military force is present in, stationed at, or operating within a particular location or entity.
  • C. hasMilitaryBase
    Indicates that one entity possesses, hosts, or contains a military base associated with or located on another entity.
  • D. militaryFunction
    Indicates a relationship where an entity serves a specific role, duty, or operational purpose within a military context.
  • E. militaryMeasure
    Indicates a relationship where an entity undertakes, imposes, or is subject to a specific military-related action, policy, or operational measure.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4933208e88190891f5debab1b776d completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4985e51908190a34aa82ea9dbee1e completed March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a494b257108190a537dffbb9d621b5 completed March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:32 p.m.