Triple
T52975
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ordinary People |
E1040
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMusicVideo |
P3287
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Ordinary People, hasMusicVideo, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMusicVideo Context triple: [Ordinary People, hasMusicVideo, yes]
-
A.
associatedMusic
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to or connected with a piece of music, such as being used by, related to, or thematically tied to that music.
-
B.
hasNotableRecordingBy
Indicates that an entity (such as a work or composition) has a well-known or significant recording created or performed by a specified agent (such as an artist, ensemble, or label).
-
C.
hasPartInDiscography
Indicates that an entity (such as a song, album, or track) is included as a component within another entity’s discography.
-
D.
hasChorus
Indicates that something (typically a song or musical piece) includes a chorus section as part of its structure.
-
E.
musicBy
Indicates that a piece of music, performance, or recording is created, composed, or performed by a specified musical artist or group.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2480baefc81909951b14058479aa2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24c709c248190bcd442c8d508e48c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ac3c8dc819099849023bdaa35a9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a24c6ff0588190b0fd864da9aa8569 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:47 a.m.