Triple
T5289304
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation |
E119702
|
entity |
| Predicate | faultRequirement |
P63321
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no-fault |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no-fault | Statement: [Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation, faultRequirement, no-fault]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: faultRequirement Context triple: [Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation, faultRequirement, no-fault]
-
A.
maintenanceRequirement
Indicates that an entity is obligated to perform, schedule, or adhere to specific maintenance activities or conditions for another entity or system.
-
B.
rejectedRequirement
Indicates that a proposed requirement has been evaluated and explicitly not accepted or approved.
-
C.
requires
Indicates that one entity must exist, occur, or be satisfied before another entity can exist, occur, or be carried out.
-
D.
conflictRequirement
Indicates that one requirement is incompatible with or prevents the fulfillment of another requirement.
-
E.
fault
Indicates that one entity is responsible or at blame for a problem, error, or undesirable outcome involving another entity or situation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd446de5648190b313a90bd96730d2 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd8682d18c8190bbb35cc75c8a7c12 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd844dfdac819086efedd1cbebff84 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd86800630819096dad2eb2248c372 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:40 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:52 p.m.