Triple

T528892
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Court of Session (in peerage matters) E10984 entity
Predicate mayConsider P1120 FINISHED
Object historical evidence relating to creation and descent of Scottish peerages LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: historical evidence relating to creation and descent of Scottish peerages | Statement: [Court of Session (in peerage matters), mayConsider, historical evidence relating to creation and descent of Scottish peerages]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayConsider
Context triple: [Court of Session (in peerage matters), mayConsider, historical evidence relating to creation and descent of Scottish peerages]
  • A. considered chosen
    Indicates that one entity regards, judges, or thinks about another entity in a particular way or context.
  • B. mayResultIn
    Indicates that one entity has the potential to cause, lead to, or bring about another entity or outcome, without guaranteeing that it will occur.
  • C. mayHold
    Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to possess, contain, or maintain another entity.
  • D. mayReportTo
    Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to have a reporting relationship to another entity, such as an employee being allowed to report to a particular manager.
  • E. proposes
    Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward an idea, plan, or course of action to another entity for consideration or approval.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e84b16c4819088d284c47c3a7968 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2f1d39b4c81909f265b3501b5ec1d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:46 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2f01ac3ec8190a94a05955532c7fa completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:39 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.