Triple

T5281500
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Annas E119507 entity
Predicate successor P78 FINISHED
Object Caiaphas E109709 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Caiaphas | Statement: [Annas, successor, Caiaphas]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Caiaphas
Context triple: [Annas, successor, Caiaphas]
  • A. Caiaphas chosen
    Caiaphas was the Jewish high priest who, according to the New Testament, played a central role in the trial and condemnation of Jesus before his crucifixion.
  • B. Pontius Pilate
    Pontius Pilate was the Roman governor of Judea in the early 1st century CE, best known for presiding over the trial of Jesus and authorizing his crucifixion.
  • C. Herod Boethus
    Herod Boethus was a Judean prince of the Herodian dynasty, known primarily as the son of Mariamne II and King Herod the Great.
  • D. Coponius
    Coponius was a Roman prefect appointed by Emperor Augustus to govern Judea after the deposition of Herod Archelaus.
  • E. Simon ben Boethus
    Simon ben Boethus was a Jewish high priest of the late Second Temple period and father-in-law of Herod the Great through his daughter Mariamne II.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd446d05a8819092ad333a3f9c8d5c completed March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd84c5212481909cb3b5f43c0eedc0 completed March 20, 2026, 5:32 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69bf187d8a7c8190a8d686393d277bab completed March 21, 2026, 10:15 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:52 p.m.