Triple

T52630
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Interface Message Processor E1033 entity
Predicate designedAs P534 FINISHED
Object reliable subnetwork for ARPANET hosts LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reliable subnetwork for ARPANET hosts | Statement: [Interface Message Processor, designedAs, reliable subnetwork for ARPANET hosts]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designedAs
Context triple: [Interface Message Processor, designedAs, reliable subnetwork for ARPANET hosts]
  • A. designedIn
    Indicates that something was created, planned, or conceived during a particular time period or at a specific location.
  • B. hasDesign
    Indicates that one entity possesses, embodies, or is characterized by a particular design associated with another entity.
  • C. designedBy
    Indicates that one entity is the creator, planner, or architect responsible for the form or structure of another entity.
  • D. envisionedAs chosen
    Indicates that one entity is mentally pictured, imagined, or conceived in terms of another entity or role.
  • E. designedToEvoke
    Indicates that something was intentionally created or arranged in order to elicit a particular reaction, feeling, or response from an audience or observer.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2480baefc81909951b14058479aa2 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:42 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a24c709c248190bcd442c8d508e48c completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24ac3c8dc819099849023bdaa35a9 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:47 a.m.