Triple
T524381
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Diary |
E10885
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSongStructure |
P6683
|
FINISHED |
| Object | verse-chorus form |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: verse-chorus form | Statement: [Diary, hasSongStructure, verse-chorus form]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSongStructure Context triple: [Diary, hasSongStructure, verse-chorus form]
-
A.
hasSongStyle
Indicates that an entity possesses, is characterized by, or is associated with a particular style or genre of song.
-
B.
hasMelody
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is characterized by a particular melody.
-
C.
hasMusicalForm
chosen
Indicates that one entity (typically a musical work or piece) is characterized by or structured according to a particular musical form.
-
D.
hasSignatureSong
Indicates that an artist or performer is especially associated with a particular song that is widely recognized as their defining or most iconic work.
-
E.
hasLyricalTheme
Indicates that one entity (typically a creative work) features or is characterized by a particular lyrical subject, topic, or theme.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e84b16c4819088d284c47c3a7968 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2f1b656c08190b387f21b06d99e68 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2f018129c81909494450fcba71b59 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.