Triple

T5232256
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cotonou Agreement E118138 entity
Predicate tradeRegimeType P28271 FINISHED
Object asymmetric trade preferences LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: asymmetric trade preferences | Statement: [Cotonou Agreement, tradeRegimeType, asymmetric trade preferences]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tradeRegimeType
Context triple: [Cotonou Agreement, tradeRegimeType, asymmetric trade preferences]
  • A. customsRegime
    Indicates the specific customs treatment or regulatory framework under which goods are imported, exported, or stored.
  • B. taxRegime
    Indicates the system or structure of taxation that governs how taxes are assessed, collected, and applied within a particular context or jurisdiction.
  • C. hasLessStrictTradeControlsThan
    Indicates that one entity’s trade regulations or restrictions are more relaxed or permissive compared to those of another entity.
  • D. tradeRegulator
    Indicates that an entity has authority to oversee, control, or enforce rules governing trade activities or commercial exchanges involving another entity.
  • E. tradeSystem chosen
    Indicates a system or framework through which goods, services, or assets are exchanged between parties under defined rules or mechanisms.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd4466fb8c819083b806a79414d7e4 completed March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd7b0223148190be88d737c25d60d7 completed March 20, 2026, 4:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd77bf1ef08190bb3487b3f3ee088c completed March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:49 p.m.