Triple
T5213956
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Blum complexity measures |
E117702
|
entity |
| Predicate | axiom2 |
P62071
|
FINISHED |
| Object | set of triples (program,input,complexity) is decidable |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: set of triples (program,input,complexity) is decidable | Statement: [Blum complexity measures, axiom2, set of triples (program,input,complexity) is decidable]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: axiom2 Context triple: [Blum complexity measures, axiom2, set of triples (program,input,complexity) is decidable]
-
A.
foundationAxiomHoldsIn
Indicates that the foundation (or regularity) axiom is satisfied within a given model, structure, or context.
-
B.
hasAxiom
Indicates that an entity is associated with, defined by, or governed through a specific axiom or set of axioms.
-
C.
logicSystem
Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with, defined within, or governed by a particular logical framework or system of formal reasoning.
-
D.
replacementAxiomHoldsIn
Indicates that a specified replacement axiom is valid or satisfied within a given logical system, structure, or context.
-
E.
isEquiconsistentWith
Indicates that two formal theories or systems have the same consistency strength, such that if one is consistent then the other is also consistent, and if one is inconsistent then so is the other.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4464ba3c8190bc16b2ebbe42ddb0 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7a911d40819086621537274dc0f0 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd77bb4e8c819094b5ac7cf61512f9 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd79000cf88190b3c05d95395b0cd2 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:47 p.m.