Triple
T5202628
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Derniers Vers |
E117429
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPoeticTechnique |
P60474
|
FINISHED |
| Object | enjambment |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: enjambment | Statement: [Derniers Vers, hasPoeticTechnique, enjambment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPoeticTechnique Context triple: [Derniers Vers, hasPoeticTechnique, enjambment]
-
A.
hasPoeticDevice
chosen
Indicates that one entity (typically a text or passage) employs or contains a specific poetic device present in the other entity.
-
B.
hasPoeticLyrics
Indicates that something (such as a song, text, or speech) contains lyrics or wording that are artistic, expressive, or characteristic of poetry.
-
C.
hasRhymeStyle
Indicates that two linguistic elements share the same pattern or style of rhyming.
-
D.
poeticStructure
Indicates a relationship where one entity defines, embodies, or specifies the formal poetic organization (such as meter, rhyme scheme, or stanza pattern) used by another entity.
-
E.
hasTechnique
Indicates that an entity employs, utilizes, or is associated with a particular method, procedure, or technique.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4463dd3c81909966123f20b79d57 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7adb034c819086bf8a85fbf158f4 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd77b9a67c8190819612257ea746b4 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:47 p.m.