Triple
T51740
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Liberal Democratic Party |
E1014
|
entity |
| Predicate | regainedPowerIn |
P3243
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1994 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1994 | Statement: [Liberal Democratic Party, regainedPowerIn, 1994]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: regainedPowerIn Context triple: [Liberal Democratic Party, regainedPowerIn, 1994]
-
A.
hasPower
Indicates that one entity possesses authority, control, or influence over another entity or over a particular domain or resource.
-
B.
reconstructedAfter
Indicates that one entity has been rebuilt, restored, or reassembled following the occurrence or existence of another entity or event.
-
C.
isStrongerThan
Indicates that one entity possesses greater physical power, force, or effectiveness than another entity.
-
D.
rebuiltFor
Indicates that one entity has been reconstructed, renovated, or modified specifically to serve the needs, purposes, or use of another entity.
-
E.
enteredIntoForce
Indicates that a law, treaty, agreement, or regulation has become legally effective and binding from a specific point in time.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2480baefc81909951b14058479aa2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24c709c248190bcd442c8d508e48c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ac3c8dc819099849023bdaa35a9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a24c6ff0588190b0fd864da9aa8569 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:47 a.m.