Triple
T5167632
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | XDR |
E116596
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHigherBandwidthThan |
P13790
|
FINISHED |
| Object | SDR InfiniBand |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SDR InfiniBand | Statement: [XDR, hasHigherBandwidthThan, SDR InfiniBand]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHigherBandwidthThan Context triple: [XDR, hasHigherBandwidthThan, SDR InfiniBand]
-
A.
supportsBandwidths
Indicates that an entity is compatible with or can operate using the specified range or set of bandwidth values.
-
B.
hasGainBandwidthProductTypical
Indicates that an entity has a specified typical value for its gain–bandwidth product, describing the standard frequency–gain performance characteristic.
-
C.
upperBandWidth
Indicates the maximum bandwidth limit or upper threshold of data transfer capacity allowed or supported in a given context.
-
D.
usesChannelBandwidth
Indicates that one entity consumes or occupies a portion of the available bandwidth on a communication channel.
-
E.
isHigherThan
chosen
Indicates that one entity has a greater value, level, or position than another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd445ff97c81909a2615cc56235470 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd794b87508190be3b82726ef4b37c |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd77b36c008190b91011a9fa52b3d2 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:45 p.m.