Triple
T51674
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Constitution of Japan |
E1013
|
entity |
| Predicate | article9Provision |
P2948
|
FINISHED |
| Object | renunciation of war |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: renunciation of war | Statement: [Constitution of Japan, article9Provision, renunciation of war]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: article9Provision Context triple: [Constitution of Japan, article9Provision, renunciation of war]
-
A.
keyArticle
Indicates that an article is a primary or central reference for understanding, supporting, or defining another entity or topic.
-
B.
providedFor
Indicates that one entity supplies, furnishes, or makes something available to or on behalf of another entity for its use or benefit.
-
C.
articleCount
Indicates the number of articles associated with a given entity or context.
-
D.
Article5Meaning
Indicates that a legal or policy document specifies the meaning, scope, or implications of its Article 5 provision.
-
E.
proposes
Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward an idea, plan, or course of action to another entity for consideration or approval.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2480baefc81909951b14058479aa2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24ba7016481909d595402712db6e2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ac23f04819080cef9365ed990d4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a24ba5da048190a484963cb5a9bb2b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:57 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:47 a.m.