Triple
T51415
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hinomaru |
E1008
|
entity |
| Predicate | colorSpecificationSystem |
P60
|
FINISHED |
| Object | JIS standard for colors |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: JIS standard for colors | Statement: [Hinomaru, colorSpecificationSystem, JIS standard for colors]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: colorSpecificationSystem Context triple: [Hinomaru, colorSpecificationSystem, JIS standard for colors]
-
A.
colors
chosen
Indicates that one entity assigns, describes, or provides the color or colors of another entity.
-
B.
camouflagePattern
Indicates that one entity has a surface or visual design intended to conceal it by blending with its surroundings or disrupting its outline.
-
C.
coordinateSystem
Indicates that one entity defines or uses a particular spatial or reference coordinate system in relation to another entity.
-
D.
typicalBlendStyle
Indicates the usual or characteristic way in which two or more elements are combined or mixed together.
-
E.
hasAlbedo
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific reflectivity or albedo value, describing how much incoming light it reflects.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2480baefc81909951b14058479aa2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24ba7016481909d595402712db6e2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ac23f04819080cef9365ed990d4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:47 a.m.