Triple
T5140768
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | I Got Rhythm |
E115944
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasChordProgressionName |
P57752
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rhythm changes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rhythm changes | Statement: [I Got Rhythm, hasChordProgressionName, rhythm changes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasChordProgressionName Context triple: [I Got Rhythm, hasChordProgressionName, rhythm changes]
-
A.
tonalityProgression
Indicates a change or development in musical key or tonal center over the course of a piece or passage.
-
B.
usesChordChangesOf
chosen
Indicates that one musical work employs the same or substantially similar chord progression as another work.
-
C.
hasNotableInstrumentNamedAfter
Indicates that an entity has a notable musical instrument that is named after it.
-
D.
hasChorusBy
Indicates that something (typically a musical work or song) includes a chorus section that is performed, written, or provided by a specified entity.
-
E.
hasChorus
Indicates that something (typically a song or musical piece) includes a chorus section as part of its structure.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd44459a988190a772a5c2ec6a1965 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd78d7f4d081908d59adcd86f52f1d |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd77ae2f10819098bb8939106e1281 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:43 p.m.