Triple
T511719
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John Russell, 1st Earl Russell |
E10622
|
entity |
| Predicate | elevationToPeerage |
P2735
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1861 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1861 | Statement: [John Russell, 1st Earl Russell, elevationToPeerage, 1861]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: elevationToPeerage Context triple: [John Russell, 1st Earl Russell, elevationToPeerage, 1861]
-
A.
dateOfElevationToPeerage
chosen
Indicates the specific date on which an individual was formally elevated to a rank of nobility or peerage.
-
B.
conveysPeerage
Indicates that one entity formally grants or transfers a noble title or rank of peerage to another entity.
-
C.
rankRelativeToPeerage
Indicates how an entity’s hierarchical rank compares to that of a specified peer or peer group within a defined ranking system.
-
D.
typeOfPeerage
Indicates the specific rank or category within a system of peerage that a given title or noble status belongs to.
-
E.
hereditaryPeerage
Indicates that a person holds a noble title that is legally inheritable and passes down through family lineage.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e84a0d08819087e01863fcd9abf1 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2f16768c081909d05537ff070868b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2edff001c81909182a7e26c6dc51b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.