Triple
T5111065
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dudley Dursley |
E115213
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipWithHarry |
P38921
|
FINISHED |
| Object | initially hostile |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: initially hostile | Statement: [Dudley Dursley, relationshipWithHarry, initially hostile]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipWithHarry Context triple: [Dudley Dursley, relationshipWithHarry, initially hostile]
-
A.
relationshipToSophie
Indicates the specific type of personal or social connection that an entity has to Sophie.
-
B.
relationshipToCharacter
chosen
Indicates the specific type of personal, social, or narrative connection that one entity has to a given character.
-
C.
relationshipToHumans
Indicates the nature or type of connection, association, or relevance that something has specifically with humans.
-
D.
hasComplicatedRelationshipWith
Indicates that one entity is involved in a complex, often ambiguous or difficult-to-define interpersonal or relational dynamic with another entity.
-
E.
relationshipToHuckFinn
Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship an entity has to Huck Finn.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4441d1648190a54a533895041987 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd75ad362c8190b9cbded390aaea3c |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd715fe3a8819087d3065adddba515 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:41 p.m.