Triple

T5099976
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States sovereign immunity law E114957 entity
Predicate keyCase P4528 FINISHED
Object Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents E494918 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents | Statement: [United States sovereign immunity law, keyCase, Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents
Context triple: [United States sovereign immunity law, keyCase, Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents]
  • A. Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents chosen
    Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case that held Congress lacked authority under the Fourteenth Amendment to subject nonconsenting states to private suits for money damages under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.
  • B. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett
    Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett is a 2001 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited Congress’s power to subject states to damages suits under the Americans with Disabilities Act by narrowing the scope of its enforcement authority under the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • C. Agostini v. Felton
    Agostini v. Felton is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that reshaped Establishment Clause doctrine by allowing public school teachers to provide remedial instruction in religious schools under certain safeguards.
  • D. Gratz v. Bollinger
    Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
  • E. Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
    Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College is a landmark 2023 U.S. Supreme Court case that sharply limited the use of race-conscious admissions policies in higher education, effectively ending affirmative action programs at colleges and universities nationwide.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd443fc49c819089629c00e311310c completed March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd758381dc8190ac491788d27ab8e0 completed March 20, 2026, 4:27 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69bec36d231481908da4d2df53bd6507 completed March 21, 2026, 4:12 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:40 p.m.