Triple
T5099891
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer |
E114956
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalIssue |
P1640
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity |
E20912
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity | Statement: [Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, legalIssue, Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity Context triple: [Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, legalIssue, Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity]
-
A.
Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution
chosen
The Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution is a 1795 amendment that limits the ability of individuals to bring suits against states in federal court, reinforcing the principle of state sovereign immunity.
-
B.
United States sovereign immunity law
United States sovereign immunity law is the body of legal principles and doctrines that limit when and how the federal government, states, and their agencies can be sued without their consent.
-
C.
Erie doctrine
The Erie doctrine is a fundamental U.S. legal principle requiring federal courts in diversity jurisdiction cases to apply state substantive law instead of creating or using federal general common law.
-
D.
Insular Cases
The Insular Cases are a series of early 20th-century U.S. Supreme Court decisions that defined the constitutional status and rights of residents in American overseas territories.
-
E.
insular cases doctrine
The insular cases doctrine is a body of early 20th-century U.S. Supreme Court decisions holding that full constitutional rights do not automatically extend to all territories under American control, creating a distinction between incorporated and unincorporated territories.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd443fc49c819089629c00e311310c |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7568e9c881909f114973faef6832 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:27 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69beba8977f481908b0d55a9cd28d492 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:40 p.m.