Triple

T5099758
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hans v. Louisiana E114953 entity
Predicate isCitedBy P15322 FINISHED
Object Ex parte Young E115612 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ex parte Young | Statement: [Hans v. Louisiana, isCitedBy, Ex parte Young]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ex parte Young
Context triple: [Hans v. Louisiana, isCitedBy, Ex parte Young]
  • A. Ex parte Young chosen
    Ex parte Young is a landmark 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created a legal fiction allowing suits in federal court against state officials to stop ongoing violations of federal law, despite state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.
  • B. Learned Hand
    Learned Hand was a highly influential American federal judge renowned for his incisive opinions on constitutional and tax law and his lasting impact on U.S. jurisprudence.
  • C. De Jonge v. Oregon
    De Jonge v. Oregon is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and thus applies to the states.
  • D. Ex parte McCardle
    Ex parte McCardle is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case best known for affirming Congress’s power to limit the Court’s appellate jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution.
  • E. Alden v. Maine
    Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd443fc49c819089629c00e311310c completed March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd7568e9c881909f114973faef6832 completed March 20, 2026, 4:27 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69beba8977f481908b0d55a9cd28d492 completed March 21, 2026, 3:34 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:40 p.m.