Triple
T5086711
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Franklin Mint |
E114654
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfMint |
P61216
|
FINISHED |
| Object | private mint not affiliated with a national government |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: private mint not affiliated with a national government | Statement: [The Franklin Mint, typeOfMint, private mint not affiliated with a national government]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfMint Context triple: [The Franklin Mint, typeOfMint, private mint not affiliated with a national government]
-
A.
mint
Indicates the act of creating or issuing something new, typically in an official or authoritative capacity (such as producing new currency or tokens).
-
B.
mintingTechnologyContext
Indicates the technological method or process used to mint or produce something, typically specifying the context or conditions under which the minting took place.
-
C.
mintedAt
Indicates the specific time or block at which a digital asset or token was created (minted) on a blockchain.
-
D.
producedCoinType
Indicates that an entity (such as a mint or process) created or manufactured a specific type of coin.
-
E.
closedAsMint
Indicates that an issue, report, or request was resolved and marked as valid or correct in its original form, without requiring changes.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd443e941881908eb4e8c685b6f656 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd751fb6dc8190be674c92a17e8c0e |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd7159adc881909effd4382c395c66 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd73b2c2808190b777e2c2a8a45d3f |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:40 p.m.