Triple
T50460
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | House of Orange-Nassau |
E990
|
entity |
| Predicate | languageOfTradition |
P1114
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dutch |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dutch | Statement: [House of Orange-Nassau, languageOfTradition, Dutch]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageOfTradition Context triple: [House of Orange-Nassau, languageOfTradition, Dutch]
-
A.
culturalTradition
chosen
Indicates a relationship where certain practices, beliefs, or customs are recognized as part of a shared cultural heritage passed down within a group or society.
-
B.
languageFamily
Indicates that two or more languages belong to the same genealogical language family or linguistic lineage.
-
C.
hasLanguageOfOrigin
Indicates that one entity has its origin or source in the language specified by another entity.
-
D.
traditionalCuisine
Indicates that an entity is associated with the customary or historically rooted style of cooking and food preparation characteristic of a particular culture, region, or community.
-
E.
languagesSpoken
Indicates that an entity is able to communicate using one or more specified languages.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2480baefc81909951b14058479aa2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24ba7016481909d595402712db6e2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ac23f04819080cef9365ed990d4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:47 a.m.