Triple

T504301
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Infraestruturas de Portugal E10467 entity
Predicate responsibleForSafety P636 FINISHED
Object railway infrastructure safety in Portugal LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: railway infrastructure safety in Portugal | Statement: [Infraestruturas de Portugal, responsibleForSafety, railway infrastructure safety in Portugal]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: responsibleForSafety
Context triple: [Infraestruturas de Portugal, responsibleForSafety, railway infrastructure safety in Portugal]
  • A. responsibleFor chosen
    Indicates that one entity has a duty, obligation, or role to manage, oversee, or be accountable for another entity or outcome.
  • B. safety
    Indicates that an entity provides, ensures, or is associated with protection from harm, danger, or risk for another entity or within a given context.
  • C. establishesLiabilityFor
    Indicates that one party is held legally responsible or accountable for a particular act, omission, or outcome.
  • D. aimsToProtect
    Indicates an intention or purpose to safeguard or defend one entity, value, or condition from harm, risk, or undesirable outcomes.
  • E. protectedBy
    Indicates that one entity provides protection, defense, or safeguarding for another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e848adf881908e5e04f7af030093 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2f149bd1c81908ff58ac504ace2bf completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2edfce7a08190a408bc019de60d5d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.